Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yousef who wrote (37553)	9/28/1998 8:50:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572613

Yousef, <Maybe AMD should try these CPU's out ahead of time,> You mean before release of Microsoft Windows95? Maybe it is better to stop making processors any faster? Or just exactly emulate the slower Intel's CPU to avoid the timing loop problems? Very smart on your part. You made it.

To: Yousef who wrote (37553)	9/28/1998 9:40:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 1572613

Yousef, <But Ali, you have NO "useful" knowledge in this ...> I think you are mistaken even here. My knowledge in this area was useful to show that you are a flop. Your persistent claims about "inferiority" of AMD 0.25 process have proven to be false. As my last serious attempt (#493) to help you: given A1B1 > A2B2, you cannot conclude that A1 > A2 if you have no idea what B1 and B2 are. This may be too high math for your Ph.D, but I suspect you just were not educated that there are B1 and B2 in the performance equation... You obviously can't make it...