SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: j g cordes who wrote (15701)9/28/1998 9:30:00 AM
From: Jenna  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 120523
 
In XYLN, and FEET, ELNK, FHT

LBOR.. YHOO, MSPG, ELNK, CMGI moving up.. IDTC..up but could reverse.... after being up 40% this month. Another good earnings play.



To: j g cordes who wrote (15701)9/28/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin  Respond to of 120523
 
<on Japan banks.. they're lending government owned US treasuries to their banks for little or no interest as collateral.>

It's been my understanding that interest rates in Japan have been very low to start with....but although the rates are low, it is also my understanding that only the extremely credit-worthy can get a loan.

Calls to mind the deflationary scenario of the US in the '30s. What possible help could low interest rates be, as a tool to boost the Economy, if no one can borrow the money or if those that do....using it for Capital Improvement or New Business Ventures....can't find a market to sell to?

Watching Asian issues is something I pared back on doing since the Spring, once it became a more widespread

____sorry, have to break off



To: j g cordes who wrote (15701)9/28/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 120523
 
Sorry, Jim.

I was saying that I am not as versed in Asian issues any longer because they have become a front burner item somewhat.

I was interrupted by an urgent call and I had to get to another website ASAP, else I would not have broke off so abruptly in the first reply.