Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (5894)	9/28/1998 10:13:00 AM
From: mrknowitall	Respond to of 67261

Dan - "confronting your accuser"? More "postmodern" confusion on your part. He has confronted Starr with propaganda in the court of public opinion instead of with truth in the courts. Clinton had his first, of several, opportunities to "confront his accuser," in the Jones case and after exhausting all of the creative legal challenges in an attempt to avoid it, he lied in doing so. Instead of confronting the accuser (Starr) in front of the grand jury, he chose to delay for several months and then lied again. I'm going to use his own argument - what he did was indefensible. Please take the lead from your commander in chief and sit down. Mr. K.