Oh, Mr. Dart. Methinks thou doth protests too much.
When asked to answer questions yourself, you change the rules, calling them rhetorical questions. When proven to be a liar and hypocrite, you call me the same. When given the chance to discuss an issue politely, you resurrect a feud. When asked to play by the rules you have set up, you make new ones, and continue to ignore the old ones.
Again, why do you continue to demand that I answer specific questions from you, yet also continue to ignore the questions I have put to you? To call them questions engendered to make a point, silence you, and so on, is just plain silly. They are neither. They are just ones you'd rather not answer, so you pick up your marbles and refuse to play.
I will say again, I have never tried to silence you, nor have I attempted to interfere with your ability to communicate with others. I have simply responded to each post that you have made TO or ABOUT me. Please cite one example where I have made ANY mention of anything you have said to someone else, or someone else has said to you, or jumped into a discussion you were having with anyone, and interfered with the conversation. I have ONLY commented on things you have said TO me and ABOUT me. Would you deny me that right? I think not. Remember, ID, it is you that does those things. Here again, evidence of your hypocrisy and tendency towards projection. Remember also, it was not I that went to threads where you were posting, and attempted to belittle, or otherwise interfere with you. These are things that only you have done to me. I have kept my posts limited to your threads, as I respect other people enough that I don't wish to pollute their threads. You I don't respect so much.
You have this amazing ability to just ignore and gloss over the fact that you do exactly what you keep accusing others of doing. It's not even a challenge anymore to point that out to you. And for you, a Jew, to liken my questions to you to some Nazi method, is reprehensible. That kind of rhetoric is what makes us all look bad. As a Jew, I am quite ashamed to have you as a member of the tribe. Sh-t, as a human, I'm almost ashamed to. I shouldn't be surprised though, that, as usual, you end up making statements that illustrate perfectly your beloved definitions. Maybe that is your attention, and we're all actually the butt of a grand joke. It's almost as if you WANT us all to recognize your failures. You really couldn't be that unaware.
Let's be clear here, it's obvious to everyone but you that I don't wish to silence you at all. I have told you publicly and privately, many times, that I find you intelligent, and that I find the subject matter of this thread interesting and important. What I HAVE done though, is ask you to be a bigger man, and give up the need to always be right, always be last, and always be the winner. I have already apologized to others for my actions, but you are predictably silent in that area. As I have said many times, I only ask you to leave me alone, which you can't seem to do. Alternatively, allow me and others to debate, or challenge your ideas, politely, which you keep insisting you desire, instead of changing the rules as you go along. Why this obsession to control? Why the inability to answer one question, if the answer might knock you off that throne you have erected. Wow, talk about a case study ......
Funny how you claim I am trying to silence you, yet you are the one to say 'shut up'.
You are wrong, also, as to the number of people who are inquiring of you, but I guess I'll reveal that, when you begin answering MY questions, and/or allow me to discuss your private posts to me, publicly, with the whole thread. I will share with you though, a part of one reply I made to one of many who wanted to challenge you, but were afraid to. I will not, however, reveal anyone's identity:
If you notice, no one has come forward to criticize me, nor has anyone come forward to lend support to him. That isn't just a coincidence. It is probably because others are scared, like you, to get on the bad side of either one of us.
The difference is, that if someone politely challenged me, I would be glad to listen to their opinion, politely discuss the issue, and, as I have done before, apologize for things I've said, or agree to disagree. Not only that, I never hold polite disagreement against anyone, even when it is silly, or without anything behind it. And I would never do anything to intentionally embarrass someone, or show them to be stupid or otherwise inferior, unless they have done so first. My only requirement is manners. ID could never do that, because he needs what he thinks is the upper hand to exist. To do otherwise might collapse the wall of mirrors he has erected, as his own self-protection.
I will leave you as I left you last, by repeating what you said to me, early on, and many times since, (in different words) but just can't seem to follow. In your world, does that likewise make you a liar? Or doesn't it count, when you break the rules?
I'm not the least bit interested in wasting my time again. You are worth zero. Stay away from me, you stink.
Regards,
Len |
