Not only are you delusional, you now seek to lie again.
Big difference? I'll tell you...
First.... I went to a thread of YOURS. You went to someone else's thread. Not only that, my reference to you was in the middle of a discussion of how people can be anything behind a keyboard. You naturally came to mind, as you present yourself as a human being.
Second... Pick one of my questions where I left out the question mark? Easy and an oft repeated method of yours, rather than pick any one of the many other questions, and answer it. Shall we start posting all of your typos, and errors of construction? Shall I post where you criticized someone on their lack of editing, spelling and grammatical errors, yet went on to do the same, almost in every single one of your posts?
Third.... My comment had nothing to do with whether my riches were more than yours. It was to comment on how so little of what you do here is related to trading, and how I felt that you might be on Social Security disability due to emotional problems. That was probably below the belt, and for that I apologize. But wallet size? Please.
Fourth.... Penis size. You friggin' liar. As you remember, you were the first to make a schoolyard taunt referring to penises, namely, to me masturbating. That was the first mention of such a subject. I NEVER returned the favor. I only pointed out, quite generally, that men with feelings of inadequacy often resort to such tactics. If you were the psychologist you have claimed to be, you would know that 'feelings of inadequacy' is only sometimes used in terms of a reference to penis size. It is a generally a reference as to adequacy as a man, masculinity, worthiness in relationship to other men, protector and leader of others, etc. Only someone who is as small in mind as you are, could possibly take my understanding of why you made the reference, and my pointing out of same, to be somehow me making a claim of having a larger penis. I'm astounded even YOU did so. The fact is, I am quite small, and not hung up about admitting it. Some of us accept the hand we're dealt. (Puns intended)
Please show me where I ever "...indicated that (my) penis was also much bigger than (yours). Otherwise, you stand convicted, once again, of the dishonest, reprehensible man you are.
For some reason, you keep coming back to these penis and size references. Would you be as kind as you wish me to be, and be specific as to your constant referring to this subject? You might construct your sentence thusly....."I keep coming back to this area of penis size, even accusing you of something I know you never did, because ____________." It just might be an interesting case study. Perhaps you are unsure of your own sexuality. Could that be it? Here we have, yet again, you accusing me of what you have done, not what I have done. Hypocrisy, anyone? Projection, any others?
Again, schoolyard tactics, relating to penises. As Reagan once said, "..there you go again." 'Show me yours,' etc.? That is at least the third time you have brought my penis into the discussion. So far, that makes the score 3-0, in your favor. Why is this yet another of your obsessions? Why not just answer this one, huh, Oracle?
Go tell your mommy to wash your mouth out, little boy.
Oh, and with reference to And in Mr. DART's case, a virtual human being. Just kidding. Really, though, perhaps a virtual member of the intelligensia. He pontificates, belittles, denigrates, and yet, when challenged, he becomes silent. If you're interested in some entertainment, check out Subject 22850, and begin at post #65 or so, to the present,, please point out one error in what I said. Be specific please, as you insist from others.
Oh, and remember, what you keep telling me,
I'm not the least bit interested in wasting my time again. You are worth zero. Stay away from me, you stink.
Len |
