Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (5810)	9/29/1998 2:42:00 AM
From: Alex Balazs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11603

>Chuca, <<they DON'T I just learned>> Who did you hear that from? Our >paranoid poster has put out a lot of misinformation on this thread in >the last few days. I'm reluctant to even begin to address his >nonsense in that it may give it some credibility which it doesn't >deserve. He doesn't have a clue and I'm not about to help. Maybe we >should just ignore his nonsense and only address questions raised by >people with legitimate concerns? Okay, I'll bite....I've been a lurker for a while, and am bullish on MAXAM. While I realize that by reading a wide array of messages one could probably answer the question Rand is raising, would you be willing to put it all into a concise, single post, that would explain everything from the unrepresentative samples to the 20 pound leech tests? Of course, if I've been observing well enough, I can predict you'll tell me to do my own due dilly ;) but the thing is, potential investors may see your desire to leave Rand's question unanswered as a sign of the answer in fact being that Rand is correct. Now I believe that there are a lot of reasons for why the pilot plant was put on hold, probably many that we cannot even begin to see from where we are, but I doubt that I have the big picture as clear as you, and I doubt I could do as good a job. Alex