Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Probart who wrote (13593)	9/28/1998 7:57:00 PM
From: CIMA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Probart, SUNR has been around for a matter of days and GE for years. I think that is what Metals means. He likely contributed to the rise in the GE share price to $1.75, made many more people aware of the story and added to the number of posters on this thread. Everything went ballistic starting in March and that is around the time he began. It was GE management that hired him to do just that. SUNR will be providing more reason to be a good potential investment later this week from what I hear. Are you really in Fiji?

To: Probart who wrote (13593)	9/28/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: normy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

probart - metals was just copying a post from someone else on the raging bull board, suggesting that what this guy is saying is something to consider...those were not his words. the gentleman that posted that is just starting his own DD... gold sage is correct...there are plenty of differences between GE and SR to simply way that "if GE doesn't have it, then SR doesn't have it." some of those are geological... personally, while it doesn't look good, i don't think the 8k was all that negative (at least i'm trying to look at it in a positive light). they are finally admitting that Guido Paravicini's investigation was not complete enough to extrapolate across the entire concession. More work needs to be done to better define the mineral content. Nowhere does the 8k say that Mr Paravicini's report is false in its premise that there is economically extractable ore in GEs Cangalli concession. "techniques...were insufficient to justify the calculations..." resulting in "inaccurate characterization of the mineralization..." it very well may be negative, really negative...but, it may simply mean exactly, no more no less, what it says. toma