SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (18904)9/28/1998 11:06:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
This is a quote from the BKS latest earnings release:

"barnesandnoble.com's revenues for the quarter rose to $12.5 million, an
increase of 470 percent over revenues of $2.2 million for the second
quarter of 1997 and a 33 percent increase from $9.4 million for the first
quarter of 1998."

Amazon's revenue went from $87 million to $115 million during about the same period. They are on a different month quarter. That is only a 32% increase.

I am emailing you a pdf file using AOL so the Mac does not change the data and you can see what I am referring to.

Glenn



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (18904)9/28/1998 11:18:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Respond to of 164684
 
William, I am impressed with your trading style and congrates to your $$$, but I am sincerely saying the following:

You and others have been lucky(and smart) to long Amzn 6 months ago with low cost base. You also bought Amzn in the upper 120s etc, but quickly took small loss a few weeks ago. You are "long" but frequently via trading to hedge, and to lower your costs; that's good "bottom up" strategies. Slowly and surely...

Some are taking the "top down" strategies, shorting Amzn at it's highs, taking small positions, taking profits quickly, using "trading" and "hedges" whenever possible to boot the short positions, slowly, and surely...

With extreme care and flexibility, I think the "top down" strategies will fare well, too late to "bottom up".



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (18904)9/29/1998 1:56:00 AM
From: craig crawford  Respond to of 164684
 
>> Didn't Amazon grow three times as fast as B&N online last quarter? If so, why would you expect the comparison to change so radically? <<

I'm not sure that AMZN grew three times faster or not, but I can tell you why that is going to radically change.

BOOK IPO