SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cool who wrote (7324)9/29/1998 10:51:00 AM
From: Who, me?  Respond to of 13994
 
<<Most of America seems to agree--->>

But what do likely voters think?

Run against Newt


To survive in November, desperate
Democrats will try to attack Gingrich


By Jay Severin
MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR



Sept. 28 - This is now a two-front war. Did you
notice the troubled ship Clinton come about on
the Impeachment Sea during the weekend?
While the president's team will continue to fire
at Ken Starr, they have trained their biggest guns
on a new primary target: Newt Gingrich.




















The Democrats
have about 35
days to make their
case. And if they
don't, their
president —and
their agenda —
fall down and go
boom. What's a
desperate
Democrat to do?
Blame Newt, of
course.

THIS CRUCIAL TACTICAL move confirms Bill
Clinton's correct belief that his prospects for impeachment
will be decided not by lawyers or even by politicians, but by
voters on election day.
Says former Clinton White House chief of staff Leon
Panetta: “This election is going to tell us a lot more what
happens here with regard to the impeachment process than
the impeachment process itself. If the Republicans win
seats, I think that's trouble for the president.”
Yes, one might call it “trouble.” One might more
precisely call it “calamity.”
The Democrats have about 35 days to make their case.
And if they don't, their president —and their agenda — fall
down and go boom. What's a desperate Democrat to do?
Blame Newt, of course.
On Sunday's edition of “Meet the Press,” Clinton
enforcer James Carville declared his second war of the
year: “Carville will be rolling into battle against Newt
Gingrich, because Newt Gingrich is in charge of this entire
investigation,” he said. There you have the entire Democrat
party election strategy.
Why gamble the election sweepstakes and the
president's fate on an anti-Newt campaign? Because
Gingrich is an easy and reliable target. With Clinton's
supposedly high job approval rating, why not make it a
naked referendum on impeachment: “Save Bill Clinton.
Vote Democrat”?
Team Clinton knows to beware of bogus polls. The
fabled Republican backlash — voters turning against
Republican candidates because of Ken Starr's tactics —
has not materialized. And among Americans most likely to
vote on election day, Bill Clinton and the Democrats are in
very serious trouble.
Consider these findings from the latest New York
Times/CBS News poll of people most likely to vote in
November. And remember that polls of people most likely
to vote show some significant differences from standard
opinion polls that sample the views of the general public.
Preference for Congress: Democratic candidate: 41
percent; Republican candidate: 53 percent.
Clinton Job Performance: Approve: 48 percent;
Disapprove: 49 percent.
What Should Congress do?: Impeach Clinton: 50
percent; Drop the matter: 28 percent.

Thus must Democrats try their best to make this
election a referendum on Newt Gingrich, not Bill Clinton.
But given the nature and magnitude of the Clinton scandal,
that is easier said than done. And even if they succeed,
there is surely no guarantee it will work for them. Indeed, as
most voters are fundamentally in favor of less government
and lower taxes — the GOP mantra — the Democratic
strategy risks creating the first real backlash of this event,
against Democrats.
Here's what a senior Massachusetts Democratic Sen.
John Kerry has to say about Clinton's new
attack-the-Republicans tactic: “I don't think that was
advisable.” No, probably not.
In the end, the president can survive only if Republican
whip Tom DeLay speaks only for himself, or at least a
minority, in saying, “I don't read the polls. I read the
Constitution.”