Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rentech(RTK) - gas-to-liquids and cleaner fuel -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (9558)	9/29/1998 10:58:00 AM
From: Charliss	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14347

Charles, >>> Regarding your accusation about being a caring man... well Charliss, your not qualified to make that kind of statement. <<< Your are correct. I apologize. I was making an assumption based on what irked me about your evasiveness on the thread. That shows you one of my own shortcomings: at times I want people to do things my way, and if they don't I tend to be too quick with the label. >>>I would assume that you prefer the numbers quoted by Buendia yesterday. Although they are nice thoughts, and the structure of the RNTK deal could look like SYNM; it just doesn't mean it will be so. <<< Not really....for the long term yes. But frankly, the long term is not something that concerns me too much. Like a child perhaps, but also as an intelligent manager of my capital, I want some some reasonable profit before too long and a sense that I am in something real here. >>>Unfortunately in the market, nice thoughts and wishful thinking don't have any impact on the closing price of a stock.<<< No argument here. Best, Charliss

To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (9558)	9/29/1998 11:01:00 AM
From: SC Anderson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14347

After all, as I've stated earlier, I have no inside information coming from either Texaco or RNTK. To trade on that information would be irresponsible and imoral. Charles, IMO you need to think this through. In a PM you have told me you have a reliable trustworthy source. Although your source may not be a TX or RNTK insider, the information he/she has supposedly shared with you has to be inside information - otherwise it's speculation. Either the info is BS or you're acting (albeit indirectly) on inside information, ergo compromising your moral high ground. Pick one. Steve