Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (6054)	9/29/1998 11:25:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Ignore His Crimes crowd vs. Restore Respect to the Office crowd. That would be in the spirit of James Watt's "Environmental Extremists vs. Real Americans"? I wouldn't guess where you'd put yourself on that one. In the spirit of my favorite jlallen quote, I'll have to post your personal best to me. jbe might find some new ones there, or maybe they've all been recycled here already. Dan, I've really tried to refrain from sinking to your idiot level. But you are one of the stupidest posters I have ever encountered on SI. Many idiots try to entertain with their unwitting quips. Not you. You have one rant, a moronic mantra that refuses to discuss a single issue without throwing insult and flames into a perfectly legitimate conversation. Your fascination with Newt and Rush is abnormal, leading one to believe that you must dream about them. You are a sorry clown, teeming with hate and ignorance. I have to apologize to everyone here for letting my hate and ignorance out by questioning the Christian contingent, never known to throw stones, on the relevance of certain Biblical verses. I'll strive to do better in the future. We now return to our usual perfectly legitimate conversation. Cheers, Dan.

To: Bill who wrote (6054)	9/29/1998 1:28:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Bill, I genuinely thought you had reversed your categories by accident. No sarcasm there. As a matter of fact, your renaming of my deliberately-neutrally-named categories into the "Ignore His Crimes" Crowd and the "Restore Respect to the Office Crowd" would indicate that you set more store by morals than intelligence. On the other hand, your post to Dan, which he has just reposted, seems to indicate the opposite. Ah, well. In any event, it was not my intention to precipitate yet another free-for-all. Quite the contrary. jbe