SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Who, me? who wrote (6068)9/29/1998 12:49:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 67261
 
INTERSCOPE

Lisa Ronthal's
Exclusive commentary

The poverty myth:
How the U.S. Census Bureau
is undermining American society

Each year the U.S. Census Bureau issues its annual report on the number of
Americans who are "living in poverty." But a closer look at the actual material
living standards of persons defined as "poor" by the Census Bureau suggests
that these official poverty reports are misleading. Specifically, income has
been systematically underreported and living standards grossly misrepresented
on a regular basis, ever since the inception of the census rituals in their present
form during President Lyndon Johnson's "War on Poverty."

This month, Robert Rector exposes "The Myth of Widespread American
Poverty" in his Heritage Foundation piece
(http://www.heritage.org/library/backgrounder/bg1221.html).

According to this report, the majority of households classified as "in poverty"
today possess amenities such as cars, multiple televisions, VCRs, and
microwave ovens -- two thirds even own air conditioners. The typical home
owned by the 41% of the "poor" who are homeowners is a three-bedroom
house with one-and-a-half baths; it is in good repair, and has a garage or
carport and a porch or patio. The very statistics of poverty, even as thus
weirdly defined by the Census Bureau, are bogus: the Labor Department
reported $1.75 in spending for every $1.00 of income that the Census Bureau
claimed the lowest quintile of households possessed in 1995. Real material
hardship does occur in America, certainly, but most of the official "poor"
would have been judged comfortable or well-off a few generations ago.

Why all this flagrant misrepresentation, anyway? As Rector points out, the
implicit message of the Census Bureau's poverty report is that government
should throw more and more welfare benefits at the designated poor, thus
instituting and perpetuating the notorious welfare culture -- and the
bureaucracy that sustains it.

But the damage to American society extends farther than that, and in more
insidious ways. Rector suggests that Census Bureau poverty figures "have had
a distorting effect on the national dialogue by focusing attention exclusively on
income and material living standards while ignoring values and behavior . ...
[The report] encourages policymakers to focus on the symptom of income
shortage while ignoring behavioral problems, which are the root causes of the
lack of income." In other words, not only are the Bureau-defined "poverty
levels" of income bogus, they just don't matter as much as they're supposed
to: they're an effect of decaying standards, not a cause.

The downgrading of personal behavior in importance in favor of a Census
Bureau-fueled obsession with fetishized and spurious income levels has had
visible effects on America ever since the War on Poverty began -- effects
which have now permeated every stratum of society from Watts to the White
House (remember who got elected to the imbecile strains of "It's the
economy, stupid", as if your wallet and not the man William J. Clinton were
running for election?) I don't think many will have the chutzpah to claim that
those effects have been positive.

A different Jewish voice

We American Jews have by and large identified ourselves with the left wing in
this century to the degree that many Americans, both Jewish and non-Jewish,
seem to hold a conscious or unconscious belief that Judaism and liberalism are
two sides of the same coin. Toward Tradition (
towardtradition.org begs to differ with this prevailing viewpoint.
A conservative Jewish organization headed by Rabbi Daniel Lapin, who spoke
at the 1996 Republican National Convention and is a popular Seattle-based
conservative radio talk show host ("Rabbi's Roundtable"), Toward Tradition
maintains that Judaism is a fundamentally conservative and traditional religion
and that the teachings of the Torah, Talmud, and rabbinic literature are
incompatible with the spirit of contemporary liberalism.

I can't personally stomach every single position espoused by the group, but
that's not the point: what they are trying to do is to explain and set forth what
Jewish law in its strictest interpretation actually says about a given issue, and
that is a valuable service. Once you understand it, you can choose as an
individual to accept it or to leave it alone, but at least you have some idea
what the Torah verdict -- stripped of all the usual politically correct
obfuscations -- would be.

The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy finds a home on the Web

home.att.net

You know who they are. They are those who, and I quote, "desire to see the
United States enter into an era of Glory where government is restrained,
people lead their own lives and are solely responsible for them. Where
character counts and morality and ethics form the basis of personal choices.
That, and we like to screw with the liberals." Or, to put it another way:
"When people moan that they can not get ahead because 'the man is keeping
me down'" or they can't succeed because of "the man," they are speaking of
us. That's right, gentle reader: We are the Man. WE DA MAN!"

With a strong sense of humor that's coming from a clearheaded, sound-
principled, feet-on-the-ground political perspective (no fringe crackpot he --
though such are cordially invited to join the VRWC's Extremist Right-Wing
Cabal), Jose Rojas steps into the breach to provide the much-vaunted "vast
right-wing conspiracy" with its very own home on the World-Wide Web.
Become a card-carrying member today (seriously, an actual VRWC
membership card as well as other goodies like conspiracy stationery are in the
works) and receive the brand-new official VRWC newsletter, The Gipper,
which isn't out yet but which promises to "keep members of the Conspiracy
updated on current events and how the Conspiracy is involved and or
responsible for them."

worldnetdaily.com