Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Who, me? who wrote (7342)	9/29/1998 4:17:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

I consider defending this President an insult! By the same token, somebody else might consider defending Ken Starr an insult. What I was talking about was Direct Personal Insults, that is, insults directly aimed at a fellow poster (not at Clinton, or Starr, or the Democrats, or the Republics, or NOW, or the Christian Coalition, or any other person, institution, or point of view): epithets like idiot, hypocrite, fanatic, wacko, etc., etc. I don't think they add anything to the argument. As a matter of fact, they are probably counter-productive, in that they are more likely to antagonize than to persuade the person they are aimed at. Of course, if the individual doing the cussing is not interested in persuading -- that is, in winning others over to his/her point of view -- what is the point of posting at all? Actually, I take that back. There can be many reasons for posting, including the following: 1) To find out what other people are thinking. 2) To exchange information. 3) To explore the pros and cons of the issues involved. 4) To win converts to one's point of view, using well-reasoned arguments. 5) To smite the opposition hip & thigh. Perhaps we should conduct a poll of thread participants. <gg> jbe