SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ICOM: Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wallace Rivers who wrote (259)9/29/1998 1:28:00 PM
From: wallacestevens  Respond to of 494
 
Wow! That explains a few things. But the DELL crowd will start looking at ICOM now. Many eyes tend to keep things honest.



To: Wallace Rivers who wrote (259)9/29/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: flickerful  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 494
 
could you illuminate on the presence of 40 MMs....
i.e. why it would be allowed/indulged/tolerated/positive/negative.

from what i can see,
it makes for manipulation X 40.



To: Wallace Rivers who wrote (259)9/29/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: flickerful  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 494
 
are there so many in other issues of which you are aware?



To: Wallace Rivers who wrote (259)9/29/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: james d. hargrave  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 494
 
Hey Wally!- wasn't it just last year there were only a handful of M.M.'s (like 5 or 6) abusing this stock? I've missed alot in my absence. Is DNA still around and are they involved in this Dell thing?
-cat


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News