SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dr. Saeed Assadi who wrote (37662)9/29/1998 3:12:00 PM
From: Maxwell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572934
 
Dr Saeed Assadi:

<<The problem is solved. Thanks to Microsoft, timing issues are trivial and can easily be "patched". I agree that the best component is the one without a flaw. My question is still the same; [ How come Win-98 works?]>>

Don't ask the "dumb ass Intelabees". They don't have a clue. They would probably say something like "Windows98 has a bug in it".

Maxwell



To: Dr. Saeed Assadi who wrote (37662)9/29/1998 3:14:00 PM
From: StockMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572934
 
DrFool,
Re -- How come Win-98 works?

Thats a mystery isn't it. If the K6 were not a flawed chip you wouldn't ask that question now would you.



To: Dr. Saeed Assadi who wrote (37662)9/29/1998 4:17:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572934
 
Dr. Doctor - Re: "My question is still the same; [ How come Win-98 works?]"

My question is - why do the Pentium IIs all work at 350, 400 and 450 MHz under Windows 95 ?

Please answer.

Paul



To: Dr. Saeed Assadi who wrote (37662)9/30/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: Jeff Fox  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572934
 
SA, re: K6-2 flaw:"How come Win-98 works?"

Only one good reason, Win 95 trips on the K6-2 bug and Win 98 does not.

Jeff