Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : FBN Associates - Year 2000/Y2K IPO!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (1867)	9/29/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2770

Hey, like where's my finder's fee? Baby needs a new pair of shoes you know. - Jeff

To: E. Charters who wrote (1867)	10/2/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2770

Who is Eric Charters? Please note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly-educated person who managed to escape Eric's untrustworthy indoctrination and is consequently believable. Why do we put up with him? If he has any children, I recommend that Eric teach them about love, trust, cooperation, community, reason, negotiation, and compromise rather than violence, paranoia, and fear. Worse yet, he wants to spread abominable views. In all fairness, he must believe that if he doesn't cater to the basest instincts of the most soporific survivalists you'll ever see, he'll have led a meaningless life. As a general rule, I, not being one of the many barbaric calumniators of this world, claim that Eric should take more responsibility for his actions. Last I checked, unyielding rigidity is just as much a threat to the continuity of things as judgemental alcoholism. Look at what's happened since he first ordered his minions to contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply: Views once considered drugged-out are now considered ordinary. Views once considered foul are now considered perfectly normal. And the most intellectually-stultified of Eric's views are now seen as gospel by legions of vengeful crybabies. When he looks in the mirror in the morning, does Eric see more than the same, dimwitted face that all sinful proletariats share? It goes without saying that his followers have more understanding of beer and milk regulations than of farsighted plans for the future. I see two problems with his protests on a very fundamental level. First, he was warned by his own sycophants not to sucker us into buying a lot of junk we don't need. And second, his contrivances are dangerous to my health. I, not being one of the many stubborn heretics of this world, hope that humanity will rid this earth of the worst kinds of hateful yellow-bellied propagandists there are with the greatest dispatch, since otherwise, the earth might well become rid of humanity. Eric's little world is far from reality. To be fair, Eric's rejoinders need to be reassessed with Eric's ulterior motives in mind. Here's the story: there is no question that you do not need to be unrealistic to know that if the word "phoneticogrammatical" occurs to the reader, he or she may recall that Eric once tried to bombard me with insults. And that's it. members.tripod.com Your Friend, zonkie.....