Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goodboy who wrote (5183)	9/29/1998 5:24:00 PM
From: Christiaan McDonald	Respond to of 21143

Goodboy, I have posted on Yahoo that I like SEAC as a competitor. The reasons I like them as a competitor are: 1) TWX and other cable companies say we MUST have two companies 2) SEAC does not have deep pockets and cannot "buy" business 3) CCUR has much more experience in server engineering than SEAC 4) "Connections" will only get your foot in the door. The bulk of the business will be based on price, performance, and delivery. 5) I think we've got them beat now and we can fund R&D at a level to stay ahead of them. Ken

To: Goodboy who wrote (5183)	9/29/1998 6:21:00 PM
From: SHUE1	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 21143

I am an investor in ccur that has been reading this thread for a while now. Until recently, I was more than content to stay on the sidelines. However, I noticed something about your posts that I found so annoying that I had to pay the $60 to respond. You can go days without posting a thing and then after the stock begins to move or volume increases ever so slightly you rear your bandwagon jumping ugly little head. Like a "hype" cancer you spread these little stories that you call "the facts" that rarely even mention ccur. Then, like an excited little boy, you begin using phrases like "hold on", "here we go", and "enjoy the ride". You micro manage the information flow on this stock, talking about every little inconsequential article that comes out that remotely deals with the subject. If only you would have done the same with your actual position, you would not have left so much money on the table - I assume that you have a large position in this, although I would not be surprised if you didn't and have instead allowed others to put their stones on the table. Like a bug zapper your words get the rest of the pests on this thread so excited that they commit suicide - in this case not selling at relative highs. Aren't you bored yet of hearing yourself talk? Shut up already and do your buy and hold thing. I am not disagreeing that this is a good stock but you have shot prematurely on this one so many times already, don't you think it is time you practiced the squeeze technique?