Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (6158)	9/29/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: Who, me?	Respond to of 67261

Amen, brees!!!

To: one_less who wrote (6158)	9/30/1998 1:32:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

You obviously don't understand politics; political warfare; and the lack of integrity of the people that have FORCED this upon us. Why should I be upset with Clinton when people that lack any concern for the welfare and quality of this country have dropped down to a new low of willing to abuse the legal system to score political points against their enemy? I shouldn't know about Monica Lewinsky; that should have come out in some biography on Clinton years after he finished his term. In the past, reporting on this type of thing was taboo. I don't support the media that has switched from news to newstainment and needs to have the next big focus; it shouldn't be the President's private life. This is clearly the wrong direction and it isn't isolated to Clinton; who's next that they do this to? We can't run a country with this kind of scrutiny of the President. There needs to be limits placed so this can not be repeated. The system is screwed up; not the President. I could care less that he lied; he never should have been expected to answer to any of these areas of his personal life and having a legal proceeding against the President while in office is to me unConstitutional and I think the Supreme Court made a HUGE mistake on this issue and we are living the results of that mistake. That ruling needs to be overturned by some future Supreme Court.