SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : NAR FORUM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Bakunin who wrote (30)10/8/1998 6:51:00 AM
From: Andreas Lichtblau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34
 
Sorry to be so late in replying: been out in the bush looking for some late season VMS targets for another client. (Hint: don't go out the first day of moose season!)

Yes, three parties bought NAR @ $0.30, for a total of $450,000. The Press Release (http://www.nar-resources.com/nar-28sep98.html) states this occurred after the market melt-down, at a time when all junior mining stock became "no bid". This control block, held by Tandem Resources, must have been put on the block under duress, since, even a field geologist like me knows, it's not time to sell when there are no bidders. Luckily these people came up to bat, and got the stock at a discount.......nobody else was interested!

To buy quality when prices are low I thought one of the axioms of the Market; these people obviously have the confidence in Falconbridge's drilling, the Falco people on the ground in Zimbabwe and the $$$ supplied by Leonard Taylor's NAR Resources.

Happy Hunting!