Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (6196)	9/29/1998 9:02:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Gingrich Lies Low on Clinton Scandal, at Least in Public nytimes.com This is the article that Mr. Vaughn refers to, dismissing it as coming from "a liberal writer", presumably because it was in the NYT. I won't quote anything this time, I thought it was interesting background though. Probably quite dated, seeing how public opinion has broken since then. As for the "disingenuous sneaky behavior" line, if anybody cares to look into this, (not that I'd recommend it), try making sense of how I was supposed to figure out what the precise advice was (apparently to give the honest, forthright Bill Vaughn "a break") from the particular sequence of messages here, as I quoted in www2.techstocks.com . So what is the precise, factual, substantial meaning of "GIVE ME A BREAK", Bill? Post only things you agree with? Because to do anything else would be dishonest? I fear I need further clarification of the issue. I'm sure you will be forthright, honest, and courteous in your reply, as usual. Cheers, Dan.