Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (6214)	9/29/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I don't see where any facts at all have been presented to support your position. I think you're dead wrong. And thanks for the compliment.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (6214)	9/29/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, I don't know if he's a predator. I have not really thought about it but I can tell you and it should be obvious even to you Clinton abuses people. He abuses their trust and he abuses his relationships with people. Examples, wife, cabinet and the American people. Have a good night. JLA

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (6214)	9/29/1998 11:56:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

speaking of "afraid of power", Michelle, do you recall a few years back when the Dems were positively foaming at the mouth in their fear of Newt Gingrich? I even seem to recall a magazine cover with black headlines "The Gingrich that Stole Christmas". It was one of those weekly news rags, possibly US Snooze & World Report, but I'm not sure. I just remember seeing it on the newsstands. Yes, the Dems still have a simmering fear of Newt. I think your statement "Its obvious to me that there is a class of people here (all of whom have leanings to the right - not sure if that is a coincidence) that are afraid of power in other people." is a prime example of what jbe called the "smear by association". You might want to work on more unique methods of smearing; at least ones that provoke some thinking on the part of readers.