Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : JAWS;A P/E of 2 with 150%/yr Erngs Growth!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark B. Martell, CCM who wrote (2983)	9/30/1998 12:22:00 AM
From: Zeus549	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4230

Mark, With all due respect I don't think Mr. Vellmers has a whole lot to worry about. I don't particularly care for his type but if he wants to get his subscribers out because he thinks that the SEC is investigating some particular aspect seems to me to be his business and those who subscribe. Who cares. If there is a huge short, then it ain't gonna matter anyway, is it? The company has been on the wrong side of disinformation also as I recall. No one cares about that anymore either, because the only thing that seems to matter right now is the possibility of a bonafide short squeeze. IMO, other than the illegal short position, this company is not exactly in the drivers seat on anything. Let's face it the From 10 thing is getting to be a joke. That doesn't matter either as long as Nutstoo keeps pulling certs and the real float is around 3.3 million as claimed. The only thing that might put a crimp in this as I see it, is if the SEC does find something serious and halts trading, then all bets are off at least until the dust settles.

To: Mark B. Martell, CCM who wrote (2983)	9/30/1998 12:33:00 AM
From: william Velmer	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 4230

Mark: Within the letter from the SEC. It states: Re:In the Matter of Great White Marine and Recreation & In the Matter of Certain Internet Newsletters. It obviously talks about two different subjects: 1. newsletters 2. JAWS It should be understood that during numerous conversations with the SEC in is easy to conclude that the investigation deals with many facets of JAWS. If you can call the SEC they should readily be able to expand on what the SEC looks for when companies are under investigation. I must admit that Mr. Minski I surely do not understand his motive! He calls me to inform me that in his opinion that JAWS is a scams and then turns around and informs people that we talked! I really do not needs this stuff in my life. As stated before when and if JAWS becomes fully reporting, total shares outstanding are accurate and the SEC investigation is over I have no problem re-visiting this situation. I was attracted by the numbers initially and that is why we recommended it. You may think that we hype stocks, but that is not true! We only recommend stocks with numbers and estimates from management. If I did not inform my subscribers of the developments as they came up then I would have been withholding inside information. Why did all the other "players" hide the fact of SEC involvement? If you decide to remain civil with our discussion I will answer any other questions that you will have!