SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (6242)9/30/1998 1:50:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
jbe, Newt is a deal-maker, much like Clinton. He does things by "dealing" individually with House members: "you support me on this, and I'll support you on that". "I will support you on that, if you support me on this." "If you support me on this, I'll back off promoting X until XX date at minimum".

He does things purely based on immediate political expediancy. He, like all the career politicians who wield powerful positions in Wash. DC, is opposed to term limits. And these career politicians are deathly afraid of campaign finance reform. Campaign finance reform was, if I recall correctly, one of the items on the "Contract with America", which the liberal mainstream media derided as the "Contract On America".

Campaign finance reform would limit if not do away with PACs and their shameless ability to outright buy Congressional votes. Yet when Congresswoman Linda Smith attempted to bring a bill to the floor of the House on Campaign finance reform, Newt Gingrich put the kabosh on it, because it didn't fit in with the politically expediant deal-making he had going with key members of the Senate, his own House, and the White House.

From the Lewiston (ID) Tribune: "Smith points out, for instance, that Congress actually schedules some votes on the same night that lobbyists affected by those votes are invited to fund-raising parties on Capitol Hill. The roll isn't called until the money rolls in. It's a blatant shakedown. Members of congressional committees accept campaign contributions from interests with business before those committees. What a judge would be jailed for, members of Congress keep technically legal and use to perpetuate themselves in offices. Smith opposes that. Few in Congress do. Most consider her a goody-two-shoes. She riles the regulars. They want her and her noisy reform movement out of Congress. And the urge to do her in is bipartisan, widespread and frantic. This is the measure of how mired in the old ways this Congress has become."

In a letter to grassroots supporters, Linda Smith noted one example of how the system works (I'm going by memory, these aren't exact words): A piece of legislation detrimental to tobacco company interests was coming down to the night of the vote, and by headcounts, a majority had committed to voting for it. But that night, when the vote was taken, tobacco company lobbyists mingled on the floor of Congress, and Linda actually witnessed checks being passed from lobbyiests to Congressmen, right on the floor of Congress. When the vote was taken that night, the bill failed to pass.

That, my friends, is how Congress works. That is how Clinton works, and yes, that is how Newt works. That is how all the most powerful politicians work. It's sad, and I consider it to be a corrupt system, and it's not right. Linda Smith is running for U.S. Senate this November, and she doesn't take PAC money, but only donations from individuals, mostly from people in her own district. She didn't take PAC money last campaign either, yet she beat the Democratic incumbent holding the Congressional seat (3rd District, WA).

Think of it: If Linda wins for Senate, she'll be the only one there who can't be bought. They fear her in Congress, because she threatens to cut off their vote-selling business. Think of it: people like Newt and Conyers and Ted Kennedy, et al, might actually have to decide a vote based on the rightness of it for America! These corrupt politicians wouldn't know what to do.