SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Texas Instruments - Good buy now or should we wait? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pat mudge who wrote (4042)9/30/1998 10:45:00 PM
From: Danny Hayden  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6180
 
TI's chief economist retires as company
narrows its focus

By J. Robert Lineback
Semiconductor Business News
(09/30/98, 05:35:45 PM EDT)

An era of sorts has quietly come to anend at Texas Instruments Inc. in Dallas
with the earlyretirement of chief economist Vladi Catto, who often spoke
before trade group meetings and financial analysts about the impact of global
economic trends on the semiconductor industry.

Catto, who joined TI in 1970s as a financial analyst, had been TI's chief
economist since 1976. Like a number of other TI executives, Catto accepted
an early retirement package from the Dallas company, which has been
downsizing itself after selling off more than a half dozen businesses to focus
more heavily on digital signal processing solutions.

Along with Catto's retirement, TI has decided to no longer present broad
overviews of industry trends and global conditions impacting the growth of
semiconductors. For years, Catto's overview of economic conditions and
other market conditions effecting the chip business had been high points in TI
analyst and press briefings.

The move reflects how much TI has changed in the past 20 years. Two
decades ago, the Dallas company was the world's largest IC manufacturer,
pumping out a range of commodity building blocks, 4-bit microcontrollers and
memories. It also had large businesses in consumer electronics, defense
systems, computers and oil search services. After selling off most of its
non-semiconductor operations in the past three years, TI has narrowed its
focus further with the $800 million pending sale of its DRAM business to
Micron Technology Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Does anyone know why this sale is pending? Or is there a transfer date
or something like that. Just curious.. Maybe Mr. Catto will go to Micron,his services seem valuable at least for investors sake...



To: pat mudge who wrote (4042)10/1/1998 10:45:00 PM
From: Danny Hayden  Respond to of 6180
 
TI preps Merced-compliant power supply
controller

By Stephan Ohr

DALLAS — Texas Instruments Inc. will take the wraps off a power-supply
controller next week that will support Intel Corp.'s upcoming Merced
processor. The TPS5210 breaks new ground in transient response and
current-handling capability, and is being released as details emerge of
Merced's power requirements and architecture.

No published information exists on the power requirements of the IA-64
architecture, which will be first implemented in the Merced processor
scheduled to appear in mid-2000. But discussions with industry sources
suggest a continuation of the trend toward lower core voltages, higher output
current and faster transient response times exhibited with the advanced
Pentium parts.

The 64-bit processor will not represent a drastic change over the Pentium in
voltage-regulator-module (VRM) requirements. The biggest change — one
that will make things easier for VRM designers but actually suggest a sea
change on motherboard design — is that the base system voltage will be 12
V, not 5 V.

Like the Pentium VRM, the Merced will demand a precise core voltage set
by a 5-bit voltage identification (VID) code. The voltage can be anywhere
between 3.6 and 1.8 V, though a 1-V core is likely on Intel's road map. The
current requirement, up to 11 A on the Pentium parts, will be up to 19 or 20
A on Merced. Like the Pentium, the Merced will toggle between sleep and
awake states. Tied to a 400-MHz clock, the transition from quiescent states
to a full 20-A current draw can go as fast as 250 ns — and motherboard
designers will like not having to leave a lot of space for a capacitor reservoir.

Rather than being called a Merced controller, TI's TPS5210 might be more
appropriately characterized as "the most advanced Pentium VRM controller,"
said Steve Goacher, TI's analog section manager. "Customers will find this
part meets the needs of future PCs based on the Merced," he said.

The part claims an ability to deliver up 30 A, and can effect a
30-A/microsecond current ramp. The device has a programmable output
voltage range of 1.3 V to 3.5 V, determined by an integrated 5-bit D/A
converter.

The controller is essentially a synchronous dc-to-dc converter that uses a
hysteretic control loop to improve the switching regulator's current response
to transient requirements. In operation, a trip comparator looks at the
hysteretic loop voltages and compares these with a precision reference. The
comparator will be triggered the instant the two voltages are not symmetrical.
That gives the controller a 250-ns response time.

An additional droop compensation circuit improves regulation. On the test
bench, said Goacher, TI's engineers put the part through a 0.1-A to 20.4-A
load step, similar to what a Merced-based system might demand in a
desktop. With a 12-V input and 2-V output, the droop on the output from the
current surge was only 111 mV. The droop compensation also eliminates the
need for extra external capacitors — a savings of 60 cents, which can
become substantial in very high volumes, said Goacher.

The part includes two 2-A internal MOSFETs that drive external n-channel
power MOSFETs. The entire VRM can come together for less than $9, TI
said.

TI may be trying to leapfrog the market for VRM controllers for Intel CPUs.
The company does not now appear to be a significant player in the market
for Pentium VRM controllers, an arena dominated by Harris Semiconductor,
Raytheon (now part of Fairchild Semiconductor) and, to a much smaller
extent, Cherry Semiconductor. Unitrode also made an offering for Pentium
VRM control. Analog Devices' late entry into the market this year felt like
someone shouldering his way onto a crowded bus.

On the other hand, manufacturers with acknowledged strengths in voltage
regulators — National Semiconductor, Maxim Integrated Products and
Linear Technology Corp. — did not appear to be significant factors in the
Pentium VRM market. It is possible that design wins were obtained by these
companies in the less-visible market for mobile Pentium power regulators.

In any case, whether they claim to support the Merced processors or not,
many voltage-regulator manufacturers are likely to participate in a growing
trend toward double- and triple-output regulators. In some cases, these
triple-output devices will show an odd combination of output voltages.