Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Aaron M. Hightower who wrote (7788)	9/30/1998 12:27:00 PM
From: Claude	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16960

3DFX INTERACTIVE STARTED AT BUY - WEDBUSH MORGAN

To: Aaron M. Hightower who wrote (7788)	9/30/1998 3:11:00 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Respond to of 16960

Aaron, (1) Multitexturing is patentable Wrong. The implementation of multitexturing is patentable. (2) Patentable has only two t's Noted. Thanx. (3) They _did_ get a patent on it The court will decide exactly what they got a patent on. It is not so cut and dry or the lawyers would be out of business :) (4) You didn't specify _which_ company you "verified" your claim that "They have no holds on multitexturing in general or on the 'method' which is in use in DxD" 3Dfx of course. Who else. I was on the phone for over an hour with 3Dfx and some of the questions I had are still not fully resolved and they are going to get back to me on that. On the topic of law suit however, they were clear and they essentially confirmed everything I've said on the topic. Consider my long position "support" more than anything else. Isn't that what a company wants from an investor?... When it comes to 3Dfx I am totally confused as to 'what' they want from the investors. I hope you are keeping your shares in a cash account to keep the short sellers hands off it. When discussing the price action of TDFX, all the other points you are making <said in a Borg Collective voice> is irrelevant. Regards, Sun Tzu