Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Christiaan McDonald who wrote (5202)	9/30/1998 3:02:00 PM
From: steve olivier	Respond to of 21143

Ken, you are missing my point. If what port_mgr says about the president's message is true, then only selected few have significant information about the company. It sounds like TWX has definitely selected ccur, and if you didn't read SI, would you know this? You would be anticipating / expecting it, but you wouldn't know it for sure! There is a big difference!

To: Christiaan McDonald who wrote (5202)	9/30/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: Don Hand	Respond to of 21143

Did you notice that SEAC did not have a stock reference to TWX or SEAC on that press release. Also no quotes from TWX. I wonder if they had permission to release that press report ? I also see that hardly any shares have been bought on the news. Very strange.....

To: Christiaan McDonald who wrote (5202)	9/30/1998 3:06:00 PM
From: zoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21143

Ken, Why would they get no benefit? 1. They would dilute the importance of the SEAC announcement. 2. TWX would have lots of momentum with two announcements. 3. CCUR would not be an also-ran by putting distance between the two announcements. i.e. Oh yeah, didn't someone else already announce that they were the vendor first??? Maybe I don't get the PR strategy but ANY announcement would be appreciated. I don't think the president's letter in the annual really says anything of substance or their lawyers wouldn't allow it to go to print before an announcement was made. Also, the annual is usually supposed to refer to business activity in the PREVIOUS year, am I wrong?