Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (13699)	9/30/1998 3:40:00 PM
From: sunset	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

HE'SSSSSSSSS BACK CHIEF HENNY PENNY.WITH HIS DIRE STUPID PREDICTIONS I HOPE HE GETS YOU TO SELL BECAUSE I'M STILL BUYING.

To: the Chief who wrote (13699)	9/30/1998 3:49:00 PM
From: SWW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Chief I think most of us have agreed that the sampling program was too small to characterize the concession to the degree required under IMS. But as for your comment < Grab samples lead to sampling where the "gold is" not "where it is not"!!> I disagree, grab samples can be completly unbias. Grab samples do not migrate to the gold. It all depends on who is collecting the grab samples. I have collected many grab samples and they were completely unbias. If you set up a grid and/or sampling plan and it was designed to be unbias, and you stick with it, then there is no problem. SteveWW