Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Montello Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Famularo who wrote (2468)	9/30/1998 6:30:00 PM
From: Ned Land	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4256

Haven't been around for a while, so here's my two cents: One kimberlite great; one or two more? Then I'll start to believe that these guys have the technical savvy to distinguish fly droppings from black pepper. if, in fact, it is kimberlite and not some dried up lime jello! In the meantime, gotta believe this is good news.

To: Famularo who wrote (2468)	9/30/1998 9:17:00 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4256

I'm sorry Frank but that does not make sense. There is no best target at this stage if they have hit kimberlite! As far as big goes, big does not mean that kimberlite will be a mine, the small one could be richer. But anyway, what is going on here? The yearly low is twenty and the yearly high is ninety. They are only twice the low which makes no sense if there was a discovery. Were they premature? I sincerely hope not for the sake of the rest of the juniors and prospectors. A lot of information with few facts is no good. Did Kennecott put out a newser that can be relied on yesterday or today? over and out - aj