Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7505)	9/30/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: j_b	Respond to of 13994

<<If the connection between Mellon Scaife, the Rutherford Institute & Paula Jones' lawyers is incorrect>> Sorry, slight misunderstanding - there was a rumor of a connection between those sources and Starr - that's the one that turned out to be untrue.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7505)	9/30/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

You are wrong to link Starr with the "radical right". Why do you use the very McCarthyite tactics you say you disdain? Starr is and always was a political moderate. Starr was the one who was considered so above board that he alone was given the "Packwood diaries" and helped determine Packwood's fate. Starr is such a political moderate that Clinton WH Counsel Abner Mikva cheered and endorsed his appointment. Mikva knew Starr well since they served as Federal judges together. Starr is such a political moderate that the WH howled when he decided to resign and go to Pepperdine. Well he relented and they got what they wanted. Not! So now the Clinton thugs lie about Starr and his background. What else is new?