Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (6411)	9/30/1998 7:07:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Ohhh.... pardon me..... I guess I confused your comments where you called me a sexual predator and made misc references to my phone number on a bathroom wall as my "route to success" so to speak - as a personal attack! whoops! I forgot, according to the Bible, this is a "reference to personal responsibility" right?>> Here you go trying to get religious on me again. You said: << In fact, I have worked for men that had the very same character flaw as Clinton, and in my opinion, at least one individual was a great man, probably the most exceptional person I will ever meet.>> Men implies plural and not just a couple and that you know their character like Monica knows Bills. and you said: <<I have never experienced a glass ceiling, I don't think there is one in software, thanks to the flawed men that started the industry, who like women.>> Implication is self explanatory. And you said, your phone number would be found on the CEOs bathroom wall. Of course you quickly edited that off of your post so that you could malign me with responsibility for attacking poor innocent Michelle. None of these statements are from me. These are all yours. Now I'm not saying you have to accept any personal responsibility for the conclusion a person could draw from your words. That's up to you. If you derive from this that I am making a personal attack, I don't see how. I am not labeling you or the above comments in any way. Let the record speak for itself. I hope this clears up yesterdays labeling and name calling session. I said I was sorry you got your feelings hurt both publicly and privately. You didn't accept that or apologize for any of the attacks you have driven on me or others. And you seem to what to fan the flames, and continue the finger pointing. This is not an apology or an attack. Just trying to help you with your confusion. I'm waiting to see the religious undertones you find in this post.