SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal Oak-RYO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gabe Heti who wrote (1416)9/30/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: Michael Bidder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1706
 
My apologies. It was an error easily made. When one posts as you do it is easy to mistake you for an investor.

I also find it quite insulting that you should be pushing your negative views when you are short and are anxious to see Royal Oak go under.

Why? This form is for both negative and positive views. I am short and I have opinions, I express them here. Point out my error please.

Michael Bidder



To: Gabe Heti who wrote (1416)10/1/1998 4:26:00 PM
From: john  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1706
 
<because of an investment in Antares.>

of which investment is totally worthless with regard to Toodoggone property in BC.

When pigs start flying over ur hose gabe then you will have a worthwhile investment, in antares NO but you can shoot the pigs outta the sky and barbecue the pork chops.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News