Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (6436)	9/30/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<< I gave up on that yesterday because brees and Who Me, went a little far with me. So, I changed my approach and frankly it appears to be working. The ony thing these people can understand are obnoxious personal attacks. >> I've posted to lots of people and I don't see this persistence on focusing on personal issues with anyone else. I'm not saying you have any responsibility here. Its just an observation. <<So, I changed my approach and frankly it appears to be working. >> <<You are correct Im trying to fuel this dialog of personal attacks>> What's working? You mean keeping opposing opinions about the issues of this thread away by keeping everyone focused on your personal issues. You're not taking any responsibility for that, are you? <<But you have degraded the thread which I consider to be my home with your obnoxious "ethical" IN QUOTES drivel, and Id like you to leave.>> Nope, clearly you want us to accept that responsibility. Now is this "ethical drivel" about not wanting to be represented by deceitful politicians (the board issue)? Or is it your your personal issues, AGAIN. <<so I see no reason not to attack them on their religious beliefs, and yes this amounts to pompous moralizing.>> You have never commented on any of my religious beliefs. You've made lots of defensive comments using the word religion. You've called me names, is that what you mean by attacking my beliefs? I'm still wondering what that is about. Are you needing religious dialog, are you phobic like who me said, to the point that you can't get off it, or does it help to return the focus to your issues?