Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Grinders and Gripers Coffee Shop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Intrepid1 who wrote (2348)	9/30/1998 11:05:00 PM
From: The Osprey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4201

I was perhaps too hasty in my cut and paste and associated dialogue and for that I apoligize.Thanks for the info purething. Osprey

To: Intrepid1 who wrote (2348)	10/1/1998 5:59:00 AM
From: Sawdusty	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4201

Purething and all. If you choose to speak to my motives I would only ask that you be accurate. There is no personal dispute between MM and myself, at least on my part. However, I have several PM's from him that may indicate that he may have a different opinion. I fully agree that he is not responsible for the problems of GE, but that is not the issue. I do however feel strongly that a person paid by a company that they are promoting, should declare such position. This is a matter of honesty. MM has been doing this for years and only this weekend started including the "Gold Ridge Disclaimer". It is meaningless unless he goes further and tells of his connection. When he does that, I assure you that he will never hear from me again. For those who doubt my statements, fine, but I have many examples. Purething, I admire your loyalty to a friendship but please keep it factual. Dan