Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (27963)	10/1/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Silver__7	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Paul, I think it's been said before.... it's only a paper loss, and no loss at all if you haven't sold.... You explain this one.... If I had sold my shares at $8.00 just one month after purchasing it or I held it one year (12 or more months) and it's worth $8.00 at that time... who is smarter then? I'm not into large capital gain taxes.... Silver PS: I personally think DGIV will be worth more than $8 a share when I have owned it a year..

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (27963)	10/1/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: Major Tom	Respond to of 50264

I'd rather be lucky than smart. Major Tom

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (27963)	10/1/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: MARK C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

That is an easy question Paul. The people who rode it down are without question SMARTER being as how they own shares of this stock and thus have reason to be here and post here. You on the other hand own no shares of DGIV and yet continue to post and display your arrogance on a daily basis thus resulting in diminishing respect for yourself and your credibility. This is not only a waste of your valuable time but also self destructive behavior. That type of behavior can in no way be construed as being intelligent. Next question please. MarkC.

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (27963)	10/1/1998 11:47:00 AM
From: bRiAn	Respond to of 50264

a computer geeeek...lol...go figure. pauly , you should spend more time finding a good woman, than playing with that computer of your's.

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (27963)	10/1/1998 11:49:00 AM
From: Ronaldo	Respond to of 50264

For being such a shmat boy you ask dumb questions: 1.- I for one am not competing with you, or anyone, on stock portfolio performance. 2.- FYI I feel more of a venture capitalist than an investor. A trader I am NOT. As a venture capitalist I have to wait for a series of process' in DGIV to mature (MOU's---> contracts). 3.-The price of the stock is down from it's peak for a variety of reasons; a.-the Co. did not deliver info in it's self imposed timetable b.-too much trading on the part of a "certain' thread leader c.-Bashing, + specific weakness of the bb sector d.-General market weakness 4.- Most of the people who are still here are here, not because the are religious fanatics or "crowd" but, because they believe that Mr. Chin's business model for the DGIV in the telco industry has a chance. 5.-Our mention of your Mensa membership is due to the fact that you mentioned it. Your mentioning it is directly related to your deformed ego. 6. My first recommendation to you is try not to attack people. My second recommendation to you is thatif you attack people indiscriminately (as you have done at this thread), you might as well do it 100% stealth.

To: paulmcg0 who wrote (27963)	10/1/1998 11:58:00 AM
From: HG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

I have always wondered what was "in it" for Mensa members--when I was in high school there were a brother and sister who rode on my school bus. The sister and the parents were Mensa members who were active in club meetings; somehow the brother couldn't make it in. It seemed odd to me then that the family was willing to alienate the boy in such a way and I felt sorry for him then. Now, of course, it seems even worse. Of course this story has nothing to do with you. I feel that I understand the emotional satisfaction earned from forming and decoding clever puzzles. But there is something emotionally confused in a social organization which excludes membership on the basis of ability; it sees to me to reflect a need to be recognized as not only smart, but as SMARTER. You might take a moment and reflect if your behavior here exhibits this quality. To many of us it would seem you waste your time here when there is beauty to contemplate and people to love. But surely your time isn't wasted here: you fulfill an emotional need. I guess that means you're smarter. HG