Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (65721)	10/1/1998 10:30:00 PM
From: FlatTaxMan	Respond to of 186894

seashepherd.org A good cause please take a minute and check this out. Help stop the needless slaughter and help prevent our country from being viewed as the land of the hipocrates. There is an online petition that can be signed if you wish to help out and have your voice be heard. Thank You FTM I am an Intel shareholder, long on Intel

To: Paul Engel who wrote (65721)	10/1/1998 11:04:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Further, the fact that Intel can produce 140 million transistor CPUs - on a 0.25 micron process probably gives HP a comfort level as to Intel's capability of eventually manufacturing the very complex MERCED - on a 0.18 micron process." Paul, is there a typo in your post? Didn't you mean to say 14 instead of 140 million transistors? EP

To: Paul Engel who wrote (65721)	10/2/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: tepli	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, Craig Barrett visited in Finland last week to meet Intel's local customers (read Nokia). He said in an interview that, Intels main products in 2003 will be IC's and processors in different kinds of mobile products (phones and laptops ??). And networking gears and -programs (?) In five years PC processors are just a small part of Intel's products Barrett answered "arrogantly" a question regarding low-priced processors. "Look who is making money with them: not AMD". Same arrogance regarding copper-chip. He did not see an end to the Moore's Law. "Speech recognition, 3D graphics etc. need ever more powerful processors". Comment please. Especially point #2. regards, tepli