To: Arcane Lore who wrote (7781 ) 10/2/1998 6:58:00 AM From: tonto Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
Arcane, it is strange that the boys who have the story from AZNT are quiet about "their alleged partner", the SEC and how their arguments went. I agree, it would be in the best interest of truth for them to call the SEC. ,,, The SEC is also seeking in this lawsuit preliminary and permanent injunctions from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, disgorgement of ill-gotten profits and money penalties. ... The previously mentioned search ( sec.gov ) of the SEC web site still isn't showing anything related to an enforcement action mentioning Amazon Natural Treasures. How very odd. As I mentioned before, the SEC is usually very prompt at posting word of their enforcement actions on their web site. For example, the one below describes the filing of a civil action initiated yesterday that was posted either yesterday or today on the web site. Could the SEC filing you cited be lost? Perhaps you should give the SEC a call and ask them to post the enforcement action you mentioned. I'm sure they'd love to hear from you. Just mention that you're a friend of AZNT. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15921 / September 30, 1998 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Intercontinental Resources, NA, Inc., et. al., 98-7898CM (JGx) (USDC CD Cal.) The Commission filed a civil action today to halt efforts by a purported conglomerate located in the Los Angeles area to obtain funds from investors who are offered "free" shares of stock and then solicited to make loans to the company. ... sec.gov ;