Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : John Dessauer's Investors World -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ralph C. Cinque who wrote (1609)	10/2/1998 8:13:00 AM
From: Wren	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2346

Re: 73-74 sell off. If JD said that the best thing to have done then was to stay invested, I disagree with him. A personal story. In 1972, I was with a international CPA firm. Our rules prohibited investing in a client, even in a mutual fund. Because of this limitation, my firm put together an in-house pool and hired Donaldson, Lufkin, and Jennerette to manage this fund, picking only non-client companies as investments. DLJ was about the hottest money manager in Wall Street at that time. I invested $10,000 in the pool. My investment went up for a few months - a lot. Then the sell off started. When it bottomed, my investment was worth less than $3,000. It came back, but it took until about 1980 to get back to $10,000. I learned from that experience, and I became a firm believer that in obvious market-top bubbles, you can time it. I began selling down my portfolio earlier this year because the P/Es had become so extremely high. Now, I just started to buy back by purchasing 100 sh. SPY. I will slowly dollar cost average back into some of the good stocks I previously sold. I may be a little premature in going back in now, but I have saved a lot so far. By going in slowly, I won't completely miss out if a major upturn starts before I think it will. Staying completely invested may make perfect sense in normal times, but in 1972, 1987, and 1998, the market top bubbles were obvious.