SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (15371)10/2/1998 1:53:00 PM
From: shane forbes  Respond to of 25814
 
Jock:

That is the RCA player that was scheduled to come out this month.

Will give the DIVaXed medium one more shot - but still hoping
that it is no more than a niche (an itch? <g>).

I think the RCA player may go at the $100 premium which just won't
work these days. For DIVX to be successful:

(1) Content? Needs those porno flicks... Will they get it? <ha ha>
(2) Price? Needs to bring it down to par with DVD or ideally a tad
lower
(3) Distribution? Initially tough because C.City is the backer
and the other retailers will surely just say NO - why enrich
the pockets of a competitor?
(4) Advertising? C.City slashed costs heavily and likely needs help
(5) Content Again? All the studios have now committed to DVD
(6) Compatibility? DVD is showing up all over the place in other
consumer electronics gadgets and that means the DIVX things just
won't work in these new gadgets(even though there isn't much point right now it will be important in the future).
(7) Why were sales so poor in the initial run? hmmmm...
(8) Privacy? I don't like extra lines
(9) WorldWide Distribution? Not so sure DIVX will do much here
(10) Momentum? The 2 million units per year train is DVD and that
is packed now.
(11) Extra costs for Suppliers? Those extra lines etc that are
needed are not freebies for the suppliers - someone has to foot
the cost - and over time it sure as heck won't be the C.City
shareholders - the ROI may prove to be poor.
(12) R&D? They need to have initial success to foot the bill
for future R&D. There is only so much the first 100 million or
60 million can do. After that the product has to sell. Since
sales are poor would the manufacturers have the stomach to
support it over time? Also there are vastly more players in
the DVD market and that theoretically means that improvements to
DVD will continue at a faster clip than improvements to DIVX (again
where is the money?). [Of course with DVD - more players means
more bickering...]

add any more...

I think they are a tad desperate but hey you never really know ...
until the Slightly Obese Lady sings... <g>

Shane.



To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (15371)6/1/1999 9:24:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson  Respond to of 25814
 
I stand corrected, but I would hardly call myself a fan of DIVX. This is a post of an article, but I don't recall ever strongly arguing DIVX's case.