Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : DMIL DeMil International Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Copia who wrote (68)	10/3/1998 1:30:00 AM
From: Earl Falwell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 73

Joe, quote.yahoo.com Impressive (to say the least)! I have been aware of this company for some time although I have just bought shares. The amount of contracts these guys could generate is huge. Earl

To: Joe Copia who wrote (68)	10/5/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: gambler	Respond to of 73

Here's a very interesting article showing the potential of this chamber. capecodonline.com Below I highlighted a section from the above article that requires extra attention. Some staggering numbers. Here's the real rub: Open-air detonation would cost about $50,000. The Donovan Demolition chamber would cost about $1.4 million. Even that gaping price differential should be no big deal to the mother agency of cost overruns, but for this problem: The EPA estimates that there are somewhere between 5,000 and 8,000 military artillery ranges containing unexploded ordnance in the U.S., covering up to 50 million acres. And the Defense Department hasn't finished taking inventory - there may be a lot more. Said EPA official Ken Shuster in a memo, "Ranges and buried munitions represent the largest cleanup program in the U.S." If 5,000 bases blow up their old ordnance, at $50,000 a base, that's a $250 million price tag. A pittance, in Pentagon terms - barely a wing on a B-1 bomber. But if each of those bases needs a $1.4 million detonation chamber, the price rockets to $7 billion. And some bases will have a whole lot more unexploded ordnance than Camp Edwards.

To: Joe Copia who wrote (68)	10/15/1998 1:50:00 PM
From: gambler	Respond to of 73

Here's an interesting excerpt from an article from China News Digest. I hear that DMIL is in the running for a portion of these contracts. (4) Japan Seeks to Dispose of Chemical Weapons in China [CND, 04/19/98] The Japanese government plans to spend possibly hundreds of billions of yen on the disposal of chemical weapons that the Imperial Japanese Army left in China during World War II, Reuters reported from Tokyo. Methods such as chemical destruction and incineration have already been proposed. Seven groups of Japanese and foreign firms are seeking contracts from the government, which will convene an international panel later this month to study the proposals. (Xiaolin LI, Liedong ZHENG) ____ ____ ____ cnd.org Here's the current exchange rate. Japanese Yen Exchange Rate US Dollar ---------------------------------------------------------- 100,000,000,000 12:50PM 0.00849834 849,834,253.37 Gambler