Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (6624)	10/2/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 67261

You done good this time my friend I understand.[you would be even easier to understand if you chose to leave out the sarcasm ]But I beg to differ.I am only responsible for my own actions and I have never told you "what to think ,how to think "or whatever.That just sounds good so you choose to say it.On these threads I have stated my opinions and made sure they were labeled as such.Many thousands of posts ago and on another thread I was asked if I thought BC lied. I said of course he lied I did not defend his lie because of the any picture.I was the original who coined the Jay walking defense.He lied about sex.Big deal, not a high crime or misdemeanor [as our founding fathers understood those words to mean].Here lies the place to disagree with my argument.I indeed do speak english [as best I can]I know what the words mean,I do not engage in the double talk you unjustly accuse me of simply because I oppose your concepts.I am interested in honest dialog and I understand that reasonable people can disagree.If you disagree and want to talk about it fine.But your post just spent itself defining what you call Clintionese sorry but that has nothing to do with what I stand for. I welcome you to speak to me but you do not speak for me. pez