SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Thermo Tech Technologies (TTRIF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Pool who wrote (4805)10/2/1998 5:12:00 PM
From: Robert J Mullenbach  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6467
 
Jay Taylor is not a happy camper, he said sell in update.

THERMO TECH TECHNOLIGIES I am very sad to say that the news on
Thermo Tech, is not good, no matter what the company's public relations
people tell you. Some very disturbing developments have recently surfaced
which really causes me to conclude that the CEO of this company is
conducting business in a highly unscrupulous and immoral manner. I am not
a lawyer so I am not sure whether he is breaking the law, I have no doubt
now that he is breaking all codes of decency when it comes to taking care of
the interests of shareholders.

Two very disturbing events have recently come to surface, which blew my
confidence in the company's future right out of the water. Both are
devastating not only because they could cause our investment to be
absolutely worthless. First, the Company has re-assigned its patents from
Thermo Tech Waste Systems to three individuals, namely Rene
Branconnier, Dan Cumming and Robert Jackson. What this means is that
what gives this company value, namely its technology, is no owned by us,
the shareholders.

Secondly, it was learned last week that there are now 126 million shares
outstanding! What! Yes, that'' right! There are 126 million shares
outstanding and counting. When I spoke to Branconnier in the middle of the
summer he told me there were 85 million shares outstanding. When I asked
him how and why all these shares were issued, he said they were issued for
the purchase of the two transfer stations in Ontario and for the construction
and purchase of the Richmond property but he would not give me any
numbers. Detailed numbers is what Mr. Branconnier appears to be afraid
of.

Now to make an informed decision as to whether or not to buy/sell/hold this
stock, one key piece of information we need is to see how much cash flow
those assets for which stock was issued, brings to the bottom line. So on
July 15th, when I had a conference call with Branconnier and his CFO, I
asked him for detailed project by project historical information numbers as
well a projections and underlying assumptions with respect to those
projections. Reluctantly, Branconnier agreed to provide that information to
me in ten business days, which would have been July 29th. A few days
before the 29th, I called the company to see if I could expect the numbers
by the 29th. They said they were just too busy with activities in Toronto to
meet this deadline. Unfortunately, they still have not provided this
information as of today! In other words, it is still impossible to make an
informed decision about our investment because we simply do not know
what the assets for which we have given away a huge percentage of the
company are worth! Apparently Branconnier either does not care if you and
I know or perhaps he is withholding this information for some other reasons.
Could there be some skeletons in the closet that make the economics of this
company far less than Branconnier has been claiming? There is no way to
know because he does not share information with us.

A very important development that I had not previously paid much attention
to was the fact that at the last AGM, Branconnier convinced shareholders to
allow the company to issue an unlimited number of shares of stock. This was
obviously a big mistake as we now see a virtual explosion in the number of
shares outstanding. What is most alarming is that Mr. Branconnier is not
eager to tell us what we shareholders are getting in exchange for this dilution.
What I fear is that this man will dilute each of us into oblivion.

I have now reached the unfortunate conclusion that as long as Mr.
Branconnier remains at the head of this company, our investment is doomed.
I do not have the time or space to outline all of the concerns, though I have
shared a couple of the major one with you just now. There are some very
substantial shareholders that have launched a dissident shareholder
movement. I am now in sympathy with that movement which will attempt to
change the management of this company at the October 30th, AGM. I will
have more to say about this in my October issue, but for now, if you would
like to learn more about this and how you can pledge your shares to this
movement, let me suggest you visit the Yahoo thread. Send an e-mail
message of and someone behind this movement will get in touch with you to
provide additional information and to inform you how you can participate.
Let me also suggest that you visit the web site of the dissident movement
which is: www.interlock\~ttinfo\.com.



About || Bio