SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dougjn who wrote (6680)10/2/1998 6:30:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Hey doug or Zoltan/pezz somebody told me they saw the transcripts of the tapes and it looks like one of the tapes has Monica clearly urging Tripp to lie. And then Monica says something like "they promised me any job I want". Is this another spin thing or real?

Zoltan, my condolences on the impending death of Lundgren in California.



To: dougjn who wrote (6680)10/2/1998 6:33:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Yup. Totally, absolutely irrelevant to Clinton's impeachable offenses.

I know what will happen. But you are the frog in the pot on the stove with the heat being turned up. It may take months but you'll be cooked before you even know what's happened.

>>Remember, much as it no doubt distresses you. We are a democracy,
and not a theocracy.)


Wrong. We are a Constitutional republic with a representative democracy. And that's why you lose.



To: dougjn who wrote (6680)10/2/1998 6:38:00 PM
From: j_b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<With Ken Starr as the more than willing recipient. Also recruited, perhaps a bit more subtlely. >>

If you go back to the news reports when Starr was first selected, you will find that even the Democrats were hailing him as fair minded and a good choice. Even the White House was satisfied with the selection. It was only when things went sour that the mud started to fly.

That is not to say that Starr didn't let it become personal at some point, but you are starting to make the X-Files look realistic when you start this kind of conspiracy theory talk.



To: dougjn who wrote (6680)10/2/1998 9:33:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I'm not an advocate of a theocracy and I realize that lying to a GJ is a crime. What's your problem. JLA