Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (6700)	10/2/1998 7:12:00 PM
From: Who, me?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Clinton would never be convicted of perjury in the Jones case by a jury. Only a horribly unsympathetic defendant would be.>> Clinton will not be defending himself before a jury until AFTER he leaves office. His current jury is Congress, thank God!!! Congress has a Constitutional duty now!!! <<Just not the stuff of a perjury conviction. >> Watch!!!

To: dougjn who wrote (6700)	10/2/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Your opinion stated as fact AGAIN. JLA

To: dougjn who wrote (6700)	10/3/1998 7:57:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 67261

>>Just not the stuff of a perjury conviction. When the whole expercise was a perjury trap to begin with. Which, oh yes, a jury would find most relevant. Piffle. Your legal training is worth what you paid for it. Clinton clearly perjured himself many times and his own administration has successfully prosecuted dozens for far less. As for the alleged "perjury trap", that 's no defense because Clinton chose to to commit serial perjury in an effort to protect his earlier lies, not his "privacy", which he had already given up by testifying to "improper relations".