Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (6715)	10/2/1998 7:37:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

There are all kinds of cases being brought up. The firings would have occured whether or not the BC scandal hit. The case of the Cop I was refering to involved women who in most cases were agreeable but he hit on someone he misjudged and she complained. Another case involved a cop stopping off at his girlfriends house for a quicky, while on duty. I'm sure you can imagine the scenarios run the full gambit. And the question of whether or not the firings are fair are now being framed in the BC scenario. I agree with the way you posed the victimization stuff with Miss Lewinski, for the most part. And as you said SO WHAT?? The local effects seem definitely related and I was asking I think in a fair way what that meant if anything. The question I had, was to do with local effects of the situation in general. There is more to it that that Bill and Monica were inconsiderate of Hillary. I think you either misunderstood the question or you don't think it is relevant??