Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JACK R. SMITH JR. who wrote (7756)	10/3/1998 4:33:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

<<Perhaps shorts & detractors, bring this company [lower]>> Jack says. I saw no lies or sabotage posts recently, and any half truths to paint a negative picture was matched with the glass half full in the contrary setting. Eventho I grasp no technical mining meaning, I received the message that a 15 ton did not get expected results, and rather than go to a previous known and understood and controllable and documentable state of the past where good results were obtained, it seems Mike wants to continue forward and even leap frog to the point of good returns that would have been obtained if not for the hic-up. I think this is the 50 ton hurdle. When will this be tried ? days, weeks or a month from today ? Even if they do it, it has to be reproducable. If its done thru the new manual, and scalable up and down with different tonage values, then go and buy hardware and start pumping out the stuff that is sent out of town to be exchanged for money, and the only problem on this thread will be deciding what to buy with the money from selling those just got cheap shares. Doug