Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (6818)	10/3/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<if Star has enough evidence here to warrant hearings I'm all for it>> I don't care if Starr has enough evidence. So much has been printed by so many people, that the conservative side of the country sill not be satisfied if the other issues are not discussed. If it isn't dealt with completely, Clinton's lack of credibility and the divisivness caused by his actions and by people on both sides of the issue could cause serious damage to our society. It is not Starr's responsibility to do anything. It is up to Congress to decide if the President should be investigated. It is up to them to look into the matters and see if Clinton should be impeached. IMHO, it was a remarkably short-sighted and cowardly thing to do for Congress to try to pass that responsibility off on the OIC. Funny thing about theses investigations - from what I've read, the other issues are far more serious and easier to prosecute than the Monica affair. Unfortunately, the public doesn't seem interested in anything that doesn't involve sex.