SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Schmoople who wrote (19793)10/3/1998 3:52:00 AM
From: Gil Gilbertson  Respond to of 164684
 
Re: BRCM...."A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush!"



To: Schmoople who wrote (19793)10/3/1998 9:08:00 AM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Notional value...

Schmo, forget that 1.25 trillion figure that the financial press bandies around to scare people. 1.25 trillion is the notional value of LTCs derivative bets. 1.25 trillion was NOT at risk, because the derivative bets were tightly hedged, like 500 billion long and 500 billion short, with slight differences in calendar or vertical spread.

The true figures are that LTC stood to lose 100 billion. This is a pittance in financial market terms. But the big fear was that there were many others like LTC. Look at the rumors circulating about GE Credit, which is after all a kind of hedge fund. Will there be more? I don't know.

Look on page B2 of Saturday New York Times. There is mention of Bearn stearns having loaned money to individual partners of LTC. These partners are facing personal bankruptcy, so Bear Stearns is renegotiating their loans. It is getting very interesting....

DocStone



To: Schmoople who wrote (19793)10/3/1998 3:12:00 PM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>> I have to agree also with the fact that AMZN and YHOO are prime bubbles with no foundation <<

Oh, I think YHOO has a solid foundation for the future. The problem with YHOO is the price, not the fundamentals. AMZN is an entirely different story, it's insanely priced and has weak fundamentals.

>> What are your thoughts on the short term effect of the new filings for BRCM? <<

I don't advocate shorting stocks solely on the basis of a lock-up expiring. I would have to come up with several other reasons before I would short it.

Of course a falling market coupled with a thin float can make a stock like BRCM fall real quick, so I am not saying that it can't go lower. I just wouldn't short it because of the lock-up alone.

In fact, I am considering going long BRCM here soon, sounds like too many shorts are piling on.