SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Stock Swap -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tech Master who wrote (15563)10/3/1998 1:30:00 PM
From: Grashopper  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17305
 
Kea down FRiday on double normal volume. Keane down about 11 points or 25% in last 30 days. You attach such significance to one announcement: could be cos are fixing in house, they could be going elsewhere...the real significance of the announcement is that keane not getting business they thought they would! lISTENING TO THE MKT and what it is telling you is more impt. then one announcement which you are sculptering into a positive but the rest of the World recognizes as a negative so they sell Keane. FWIW Keane much better horse then alyd! Probably more credibility too. BTW i never owned Keane but still hold 2300 alyd in ira. In a previous alyd post you ignored I told you to print the news about Barr director buying 23,000 shares and feeding the print to Gruder so he can taste credibility. FWIW i sold more alyd to cut losses then Barr director bought but perception of Barr purchase was that the man put his money where his mouth was. PERCEPTION IS REALITY!



To: Tech Master who wrote (15563)10/5/1998 1:14:00 AM
From: Larry Brew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17305
 
Tech Master, << really looking forward to the NEW ALYD >>
The current one sucks! <ggg> The entire market sucks, so I guess
alyd wins no award. Since this is a stock swap thread, what's your
opinion on the banking sector. Hedge funds are nothing new, it's
only headline because they mis-calculated. Happens to all of us or
we wouldn't be into y2k's. :-)
Larry