SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : John Dessauer's Investors World -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ralph C. Cinque who wrote (1621)10/3/1998 8:06:00 PM
From: polarisnh  Respond to of 2346
 
<The truth is, that the impact of buying shares in the company is the same for the company as it is for the individual: if the stock goes up afterwards, it was a good move, if it goes down, it was a waste of money.>

Ralph,

There is one big difference. If you or I buy the stock we haven't retired the shares since the amount of outstanding shares hasn't decreased. While if the company does the same while retiring the shares you and I now own a larger percentage of the company. I find it very bullish to see a company repurchase its shares in the open market. Of course, we will have to wait to see if it was a good investment of corporate resources or not.

Good luck,

Steve




To: Ralph C. Cinque who wrote (1621)10/4/1998 8:32:00 PM
From: Ralph C. Cinque  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2346
 
About Hilton, on the hotline recently Dessauer was explaining why the stock has come down and why it doesn't even respond positively on days that the market rallys. He said that it was because of the upcoming split into two companies, hotel and gaming, and that investors want to wait and see what happens with that before they buy. What doublespeak! The company split has been known about for a long time by everybody including Dessauer, and previously he was using that as a reason to buy the stock, that this was Steve Bollenbeck "making his move." If he knows now that the split is keeping the stock down, why didn't he realize it months ago when, knowing about the split, he was urging us to buy Hilton above 30? This has happened before, like with the Fletcher stocks for instance. He advised buying Fletcher Challenge because some of the divisions were being undervalued because of their association with the weak paper division, and that they would take a bounce up after the split. Of course, they have all totally collapsed. But I think that was also his reason for buying Hilton before the split, that the hotel division was being held back by the weak gaming division, so you buy before the split and take advantage of the price inefficiency. Where does he get the nerve, the audacity, to now tell us that he's got it all figured out, that the split is working against the stock? One thing you can be sure of is that he is always going to have an explanation for stock market action and individual stock performance, but the explanation is never going to involve misjudgment or miscalculation on his part.