SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: VALUESPEC who wrote (38278)10/3/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: nmk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
 
Why are you asking Vic or anyone else on this board these questions? I believe that if you really wanted answers you'd ask Helen, as the Press Release directs. Or even Frank himself. Or Peter.

Look, VS, I know you want to play devil's advocate here but get real.

All these questions you ask of us, some of which have answers that you could easily find yourself, are asked in a very inflamatory manner...For example, the paragraph..."Didn't they burn.....and things could get nasty.''

This kind of rhetoric only serves to inflame, not educate.

Please, this line is for an exchange of questions between investors. I own a very large stake in this company and welcome any information that we can all exchange here.

If you want to help that exchange, ask your questions to Helen and then post the answers. If you question the answers that you have received. Let's hear your analysis of the situation.

I believe that it's about time you stop shouting "fire" and find out if there's smoke anywhere. Given the facts of the current press releases-which are verifiable-your personal reputation is at stake here.

It's about time we give each other the respect that's due. That includes you-and FTEL



To: VALUESPEC who wrote (38278)10/3/1998 3:10:00 PM
From: Darrel Orpen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 41046
 
VS, you said
"After all, he made millions on his sales (of shares) from not too long ago."

You still haven't shown verification these sales occurred. You, in a simple manner, simply found a difference of outstanding shares Frank Peters owned at quarters' end. And has been pointed out to you, there can be a multitude of reasons for these reported differences.

Again, where are the verifications Frank Peters sold shares? My understanding is they have to be declared.

Darrel Orpen



To: VALUESPEC who wrote (38278)10/3/1998 3:47:00 PM
From: David Colvin  Respond to of 41046
 
Does the word "progress" mean anything to you?

Evidently not.



To: VALUESPEC who wrote (38278)10/3/1998 4:23:00 PM
From: Seth L.  Respond to of 41046
 
Have revenues per share increased? Probably negligible if they have. You are correct that at the present rate of revs that the per share math has been diluted. The question goes a lot deeper for those that are investing in the future here. Bottom line is that this is just a taste of what future revs might bring if the market opens up like most major players like Cisco expect it to. Another words even 30M shares issued would still be a small amount compared to the buying interest that will be generated if the stay this course.

How many shares were issued which in effect dilutes any alleged progress? How big was the loss this quarter? Another smoke screen my internet equivalent to a nat flying around my head. Sooner or later you will become a black smudge. This quarter means dick other than indication of the companies progress and growth.

but how are the expenses? Last quarter, didn't they spend over $ 2 mil more than they made?Yepper , I am sure that you stand for the idea that a startup company should not invest in themselves to institute growth and potential revenue increase in return. I am sure you would invest in a company that cooks the books and pays a dividend.

They had about $ 5.7 mil in cash. How long will that last?
I believe that you know that Fnet will lesson that burden if Sutro is successful in their PP. With the growth of revs from Fnet and the increased sales interest in Tempest you will see the burn rate slow to a stop. Could take awhile before they are in a positive cash flow but their cash reserves will carry them until they reach that goal. By the way I believe that they will reflect a much nicer share price way before they reach this goal.

Didn't they burn another $ 2+ mil since June 30th? Then they might only have $2.7 mil or less ! That means one more quarter and things could get nastyIf If If only to be followed by Risk Risk Risk. Well I could be just as persuasive by saying that if Sutro finalized a large dollar PP than I guess things would get nasty for some people that may be holding short positions. My suggestion is for all that are invested to watch carefully and pay attention to all the information and stop the focus on just negative information. If this company was as bad off as some of these posters have tried to portray than we would be wall papering our bathrooms already with the shares we own. I am not sure where this will end up yet but I myself still believe that they are moving in the right direction.

On the other had, it is nice to see revenues increasing, but is it too little too late? I suspect it is,but who knows? Wow that was interesting you state like your sure of what you are saying than you end it with who knows. Fact is you do not, do you?

What is the quality of the revenues? We'll see when the 10Q comes out. It is then that we will know the whole truth. YES we will.

In summary, I think there is still a lot of serious concerns for this company, and it appears they will run out of cash before they make a profit. Although sales are better than I expected, the burn rate is much worse than I expected. And, of course, I don't know how they generated those revenues or what the quality of those revenues is. For instance, did they get a one-time payment of some type? Is a stream of revenues about to end? What a bunch of BS IMO In summary you are so busy trying to turn a negative out of a positive that you maybe missing an opportunity to turn your CD losses into FTEL profits. But to steal your line we will see if my opinions will be vindicated over time.

sethy



To: VALUESPEC who wrote (38278)10/3/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: DavidCG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
 
Spare me your condescending chatter..

Stop worrying about FTEL's cash flow and spend time looking at your failed investment at Cendant (CD). Now hovering around $10.

In fact, why not vent some of that frustration at Cendant's incompetent management?

If I had money in Cendant, I'd tell ya, I'd be much more worried what was happening to my money as is goes down the toilet than worry about some other investor's money.

At least FTEL's accountants don't use questionable accounting practices that put revenues and sales anywhere they want to like Cendant does.

Must be nice to create money from nothing. Must be that "Cendant Magic"...

FTEL is turning the corner and selling more and more boxes each quarter, in addition their subsidiary, FNET is for the first time getting revenues from Internet Telephony overseas.

The first three quarters of 1998 laid out the framework for FTEL/FNET to launch forward.

The fourth quarter and beyond is where FTEL/FNET starts it's explosive growth phase.

I think people were expecting this in July... so I figure FTEL/FNET is
3 months behind schedule. That 3 months also shook up a lot of investors out of the vision.

That is unfortunate... but it will happen with any delay.

Internet Telephony sector is expanding, not contracting ...meaning box sales are going to get stronger and stronger as time passes.

I'm looking to the more successful Internet Telephony stocks as a guide... like IDTC. It went from $13 to $28 in September after hitting its $13 low.

People lost its confidence in IDTC too, and quickly, like a firestorm, ran back into it.

As long as their revs are increasing I see the future for FTEL, too.

-DavidCG

CD : $10.75




To: VALUESPEC who wrote (38278)10/3/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: vic klimpl  Respond to of 41046
 
Hey spec,
pm me when your boys down south tell you when to buy.hmmmmmmmmmmThe way your bashing I dont think we have to long to wait.clgy Conversion and a convert.rothflmao



To: VALUESPEC who wrote (38278)10/12/1998 8:16:00 PM
From: donald rochefort  Respond to of 41046
 
vs you said( with ftel I AM ALLWAYS CYNICAL) NOW THATS PRETTY FUNNY WHEN YOU CONSIDER CD IS TIED IN WITH ONE WORD.NOW WAIT I WILL THINK OF IT AAAAAAAAAAAAAA O THATS RIGHT FRAUD!!!!!